No, "bullet control" isn't an answer to mass shootings

Years ago, Chris Rock did a funny bit about how bullet control would reduce gun-related fatalities. What he said was, basically, if you made ammo cost $10,000 per round, the gangbangers would end drive-bys and make sure they don’t hit anyone but the guy they meant to hit.

Of course, Rock’s delivery made it hilarious–and, obviously, no one slapped him in the face for it, either.

But that’s comedy. It’s not a serious policy recommendation. Unfortunately, “bullet control” or ammo control is a new battleground in the Second Amendment debate.

Over at USA Today, the paper that notoriously treated chainsaw bayonets as a common thing is now jumping on the ammo control bandwagon.

Source: Bearing Arms
Macro shot of ammo by Kool C is licensed under Unsplash unsplash.com

Gun Dynamics® in the Media

NRATV
OANN
reuters
Nasdaq
Forbes
Newsmax
GUN WORLD
NYT
yahoo
guns.com
AAN
presscorp
dailyworld
Longroom
Forextv
wgmd
peoples trust toronto
wallstreet reporter
The Gun Feed
baltimore post
usweekly
Trumptrain
Christian Science Monitor
compuserve
newstage
Circa
yournews