Gun Groups Seeks Supreme Court Review In Challenge Of Calif. Handgun Statute


BELLEVUE, WA –  The Second Amendment Foundation and Calguns Foundation have petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court for a review of their challenge to California’s “Unsafe Handgun Act,” a part of that state’s penal code that violates the Second Amendment by banning handguns of the kind in common use for traditional lawful purposes.

Second Amendment Foundation and Calguns are joined by private citizens Ivan Pena, Dona Croston, Roy Vargas and Brett Thomas. They are represented by attorneys Donald Kilmer of California and Alan Gura of Virginia. The case is known as Pena v. Horan.

“Our challenge of the California Unsafe Handgun Act (UHA), if the high court accepts it for review, could be a critical wake-up call to lower federal courts that continue to employ what they call an ‘interest-balancing approach’ to deciding gun control cases because that strategy is forbidden by the 2008 Heller decision,” noted SAF founder and Executive Vice President Alan M. Gottlieb. 

California’s Unsafe Handgun Act generally prohibits the manufacture, import or distribution of handguns that do not meet the state’s extremely restrictive design requirements under the state penal code. The result, as the plaintiffs contend in their petition for high court review, is that the state is gradually achieving a handgun ban because they cannot meet the impossible requirements, which include microstamping. That technology is not offered by any handgun manufacturer because it cannot be practically implemented, the petition notes.
Source: Ammo Land

Gun Dynamics® in the Media

Forbes
OANN
Fox Business
NRATV
reuters
Newsmax
GUN WORLD
NYT
guns.com
yahoo
AAN
srn news
Circa
Trumptrain
yournews
rocketnews
baltimore post
dailyworld
usweekly
compuserve
Longroom
wallstreet reporter
bitcoinlove
peoples trust toronto
techjollof
Forextv
rockland county times